Constitutional Pariah
Constitutional Pariah
Reference re Senate Reform and the Future of Parliament
Interested in Canadian law? Subscribe to the Landmark Cases in Canadian Law series and never miss a title!
The Canadian Senate has long been considered an institutional pariah, viewed as an undemocratic, outmoded warehouse for patronage appointments and mired in spending and workload scandals. After decades of debate about reform, in 2014 the federal government was compelled to refer constitutional questions to the Supreme Court relating to its attempts to enact senatorial elections and term limits.
Constitutional Pariah explores the aftermath of Reference re Senate Reform. In its first significant attempt to articulate the boundaries between key procedures in the constitutional amending formula, the Court ruled out major unilateral alteration of the Senate by Parliament. Ironically, the decision resulted in one of the most sweeping parliamentary reforms in Canadian history, creating a pathway to informal changes in the appointments process that have curbed patronage and partisanship. Emmett Macfarlane situates this incisive analysis within the context of the roles of the upper house, its evolving performance, and historical efforts at reform.
Despite reinvigorating the Senate, Reference re Senate Reform has far-reaching implications for constitutional reform in other contexts. Macfarlane’s sharp critique suggests that the Court’s nebulous approach to the amending formula raises the spectre of a frozen constitution, unable to evolve with the country.
This meticulous and comprehensive study will become a standard reference for political scientists, legal scholars, students, journalists, and a generalist audience interested in Canadian politics and governance.
… [Macfarlane’s] book provides a clear and vigorous account of the last few decades of debates over the Senate, particularly the 2014 reference to the Supreme Court about what changes Parliament can make to the Senate without seeking constitutional amendments.
This is an important and gratifying work in the study of Senate reform, full of well-constructed arguments that are worthy of debate.
An extremely impressive book from a very accomplished author. Constitutional Pariah will become the go-to reference whenever the role of the Senate in the national policy process is discussed.
Emmett Macfarlane is an associate professor of political science at the University of Waterloo. His research focuses on the intersection of governance, constitutional law, and public policy. He is the author of Governing from the Bench: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role and is the editor of Constitutional Amendment in Canada and Policy Change, Courts, and the Canadian Constitution.
Introduction: The Making of a Landmark Case
1 The Senate’s (Unfulfilled) Roles
2 A Short History of Senate Reform
3 If at First You Don’t Succeed … The Harper Government and the Senate
4 The Decision
5 Informal Reform and a New Appointments Process: A Renewed Senate?
6 A Constitution in Stasis? Prospects and Problems for Future Constitutional Change
Conclusion: The Future of the Senate, Parliament, and Constitutional Reform
Notes; Select Bibliography; Index of Cases; Index
The Tenth Justice
Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act Reference
By Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton
No Legal Way Out
R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress
By Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers
Debt and Federalism
Landmark Cases in Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law, 1894-1937
By Thomas Telfer and Virginia Torrie
