Last Word
272 pages, 6 x 9
9 b&w illustrations, 38 tables
Release Date:06 Dec 2005
Release Date:06 Dec 2005
Release Date:01 Oct 2007

Last Word

Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada

SERIES: Law and Society
UBC Press

Media coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada has emerged as a crucial factor not only for judges and journalists but also for the public. It’s the media, after all, that decide which court rulings to cover and how. They translate highly complex judgments into concise and meaningful news stories that will appeal to, and be understood by, the general public. Thus, judges lose control of the message once they hand down decisions, and journalists have the last word.

To show how the Supreme Court has fared under the media spotlight, Sauvageau, Schneiderman, and Taras examine a year in the life of the court and then focus on the media coverage of four high-profile decisions: the Marshall case, about Aboriginal rights; the Vriend case, about gay rights; the Quebec Secession Reference; and the Sharpe child pornography case. They explore the differences between television and newspaper coverage, national and regional reporting, and the French- and English-language media. They also describe how judges and journalists understand and interact with one another amid often-clashing legal and journalistic cultures, offering a rich and detailed account of the relationship between two of the most important institutions in Canadian life.

For the first word on a complex subject, they have produced a book that is thought-provoking, authoritative, impeccably researched and grounded in reality. Kirk Martin, Literary Review of Canada
This is definitely the last word in how the message of a Supreme Court decision is translated and conveyed to its broader publics; it explains the media to the court-watchers, and the Supreme Court to the media-watchers, in a readable, profound, and thoughtful way. Absolutely a must-read. Peter McCormick, Political Science, University of Lethbridge
The Last Word makes a very important contribution to knowledge in an almost non-existent field: I know of no other book published in Canada on this subject in either English or French. It should contribute to the very lively debate about the court, not only in the legal and media milieu, but in the general public as well. Andrée Lajoie, Faculty of Law, Université de Montréal
Florian Sauvageau is Professor of Communications at Université Laval in Québec and Director of the Centre d’études sur les médias/Centre for Media Studies. David Schneiderman is Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto. David Taras is University Professor and Professor in the Faculty of Communication and Culture at the University of Calgary.


Judgment Day: A Vignette

Introduction: The Supreme Court Under the Media Lens

1 A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court

2 Equal in Alberta: The Vriend Case

3 Court and Spin Country: The Quebec Secession Reference

4 “Sea of Confusion”: R. v. Marshall

5 “Parents Can Sleep Soundly”: The Queen v. John Robin Sharpe

6 Judges and Journalists

Conclusion: Reporting the Supreme Court through a Political Prism

Appendix A: Interview Questions

Appendix B: Method of Analysis -- Coding Instructions and Sample Code Sheet

About the Authors


Find what you’re looking for...

Free shipping on online orders over $40

Stay Informed

Receive the latest UBC Press news, including events, catalogues, and announcements.

Read past newsletters

Publishers Represented
UBC Press is the Canadian agent for several international publishers. Visit our Publishers Represented page to learn more.