The Second Amendment on Trial
456 pages, 6 x 9
Paperback
Release Date:09 Aug 2013
ISBN:9781558499959
The Second Amendment on Trial
Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. Heller
Edited by Saul A. Cornell and Nathan Kozuskanich
University of Massachusetts Press
On the final day of its 2008 term, a sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-to-4 decision striking down the District of Columbia's stringent gun control laws as a violation of the Second Amendment. Reversing almost seventy years of settled precedent, the high court reinterpreted the meaning of the "right of the people to keep and bear arms" to affirm an individual right to own a gun in the home for purposes of self-defense. The landmark ruling not only opened a new chapter in the contentious history of gun rights and gun control but also revealed both the strengths and problems of originalist constitutional theory and jurisprudence.
This volume brings together some of the best scholarship on the Heller case, with essays by legal scholars and historians representing a range of ideological viewpoints and applying different interpretive frameworks. Following the editors' introduction, which describes the issues involved and the arguments on each side, the essays are organized into four sections. The first includes two of the most important historical briefs filed in the case, while the second offers different views of the role of originalist theory. Section three presents opposing interpretations of the ruling and its relationship to modern constitutional doctrine. The final section explores historical research post-Heller, including new findings on patterns of gun ownership in colonial and Revolutionary America.
In addition to the editors, contributors include Nelson Lund, Joyce Lee Malcolm, Jack Rakove, Reva B. Siegel, Cass R. Sunstein, Kevin M. Sweeney, and J. Harvie Wilkinson III.
This volume brings together some of the best scholarship on the Heller case, with essays by legal scholars and historians representing a range of ideological viewpoints and applying different interpretive frameworks. Following the editors' introduction, which describes the issues involved and the arguments on each side, the essays are organized into four sections. The first includes two of the most important historical briefs filed in the case, while the second offers different views of the role of originalist theory. Section three presents opposing interpretations of the ruling and its relationship to modern constitutional doctrine. The final section explores historical research post-Heller, including new findings on patterns of gun ownership in colonial and Revolutionary America.
In addition to the editors, contributors include Nelson Lund, Joyce Lee Malcolm, Jack Rakove, Reva B. Siegel, Cass R. Sunstein, Kevin M. Sweeney, and J. Harvie Wilkinson III.
The Second Amendment on Trial should appeal not only to legal scholars and law students, but also to historians, political scientists, and sociologists with an interest in the constitutional aspects of firearms. The essays represent a variety of perspectives, some of which are sympathetic to the Court's decision, and some of which are quite critical. The quality of the scholarship is uniformly very high.'—Lawrence Rosenthal, Chapman University Law School
'A welcome addition to the ongoing debate about the role of guns in American history and in contemporary American culture.'—Jan Dizard, coeditor of Guns in America: A Historical Reader
'This book provides an invaluable service by bringing together essential writings from a range of contributors to assess the history, originalism, and doctrine of the controversial Heller Second Amendment case. This splendid book deserves to be read by anyone interested in the meaning of the right to bear arms.'—Robert Spitzer, Distinguished Service Professor, Political Science, SUNY Cortland and author of The Politics of Gun Control
'A fascinating companion to Heller. The essays here not only explore—and in some sense provide—the foundations of the Supreme Court's decision, they contain blueprints for future scholarly research and doctrinal development.'—Joseph Blocher, Duke University School of Law
'The Second Amendment on Trial should appeal to a broad audience--anyone with an interest in gun regulation controversy, constitutional law, or American history. The book provides vivid evidence of the gap between the findings of historians and the versions of the past conjured up by advocates (including some Supreme Court Justices).'—Daniel Farber, author of Lincoln's Constitution
'Historians Cornell and Kozuskanich have compiled an excellent reader, especially designed to examine the originalist arguments of both sides of the debate. Recommended.'—Choice
Saul Cornell is Paul and Diane Guenther Chair in American History at Fordham University. Nathan Kozuskanich is associate professor of history at Nipissing University.
